Free Version

Upgrade subject to access all content


Hypothesis Test vs. Interval


An exercise physiologist is interested in the effect of exercise on heart rate.

She has the subjects walk slowly for $5$ minutes and records their heart rates. Then she has the subjects run vigorously for $5$ minutes and records their heart rates again.

The differences are recorded (heart rate after running - heart rate before running), with results below:

One-Sample T: Differences

Test of $\mu = 0$ vs. $\mu \neq 0$

Variable N Mean StDev SE Mean 95% CI T P
Differences 8 59.88 10.36 3.66 (51.22,68.53) 16.35 0.000

Why could a confidence interval be more useful in this situation than a hypothesis test?


A confidence interval meets the conditions necessary while a hypothesis test does not.


A confidence interval will have more power than a hypothesis test.


A confidence interval will have a lower margin of error than a hypothesis test might.


A confidence interval gives more detailed information than a hypothesis test does.


There is a lower chance of a type II error in a confidence interval than in a hypothesis test.