?

Free Version
Moderate

Interpretation for Estimated Coefficient on Male Dummy Variable

EMETRC-JLWB6G

Suppose you estimate the following model, where the natural logarithm of hourly wages is a function of a male dummy variable and years of education:

$$ln(wage) = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1}male + \beta_{2}edu + u$$

...to get:

$$\hat{ln(wage)} = 0.9 + 0.18male + 0.08{2}edu$$

What is the correct interpretation for the estimated coefficient on the male dummy variable?

A

On average, holding education constant, men earn $\$18$more per hour than women. B On average, holding education constant, men earn$18\%$more per hour than women. C On average, holding education constant, women earn$18\%$more per hour than men. D On average, holding education constant, women earn$\$1.8$ less per hour than men.

E

On average, holding education constant, women earn $1.8\%$ less per hour than men.