Icon for SAT® Reading and Writing​

SAT® Reading and Writing​

Rhetorical Synthesis: SAT® Reading and Writing Review

Rhetorical Synthesis

Introduction

Rhetorical synthesis is the process of combining ideas from different sources into a logical and meaningful whole. It involves examining each author’s purpose, audience, and main points, then using those details to create one unified argument.

This skill is especially important on the SAT® Reading and Writing Test. It appears in questions that require connecting information from multiple texts to achieve a writing goal. Therefore, learning to synthesize sources can help students master both analytical reading and effective writing. In addition, mastering rhetorical synthesis prepares students for future research papers, where they will need to merge different studies or articles into one focused discussion.

Understanding Rhetorical Synthesis

Rhetorical synthesis means integrating material from various sources in a way that serves a specific purpose. This process involves reading multiple texts, identifying their similarities or differences, and then blending these points into a cohesive analysis or argument.

  • It is like playing the role of a conductor in an orchestra: each source (or instrument) plays a part.
  • The writer’s task is to ensure that these parts work together and form a single, harmonious piece.

For instance, a research paper on environmental conservation might include data from scientists, quotes from environmental activists, and statements from policymakers. By putting all these perspectives together, the writer can produce a balanced and well-supported argument.

Components of Rhetorical Synthesis

To craft a strong synthesis, it helps to understand several key components:

  1. Audience and Purpose
    • Writers need to decide who will read their text and why.
    • Audience and purpose guide which details to highlight from sources.
  2. Tone and Perspective
    • Sources often have different tones, such as formal, passionate, or persuasive.
    • Recognizing these differences helps in combining ideas effectively.
  3. Key Components of Texts
    • Each source likely has a main argument or thesis.
    • Writers must identify the details that support this thesis, including examples and evidence.

Example of Identifying Key Components of Rhetorical Synthesis

Suppose there are two articles about school nutrition:

  • Article A: Focuses on the benefits of balanced meals for academic performance.
  • Article B: Emphasizes the importance of healthy snacks throughout the day.

To synthesize these, note the key arguments (balanced meals, healthy snacks), the intended audiences (nutritionists, parents, or students), and the tone (informative or persuasive). Then decide how these elements overlap or differ.

Step-by-Step Solution to the Example

  1. Read both articles carefully, underlining arguments about nutrition.
  2. Note down each article’s purpose (Article A wants to improve academic results, Article B wants to enhance daily eating habits).
  3. Look for similarities (healthy meal importance) and differences (when to eat).
  4. Combine points: Balanced meals plus smart snack choices can boost student performance and energy.
  5. Craft a concise synthesis that unites both perspectives.

Steps to Rhetorical Synthesis

While true rhetorical synthesis ends with a written response, the SAT® Reading and Writing test assesses your rhetorical synthesis skills with multiple choice questions. The steps to rhetorical synthesis are similar, so it’s important to understand the entire process in order to answer questions on the SAT® Reading and Writing test.

Creating a rhetorical synthesis when writing involves several stages:

Step 1: Read and Annotate Sources

Read each text cautiously. Mark important claims, examples, and potential points of conflict or support. Write notes in the margins that summarize each paragraph.

Note: On the SAT® Reading and Writing test, this reading step is already completed for you. Your analysis starts with a list of bulleted notes about a research topic.

Step 2: Take Bulleted Notes

After reading, create a set of bullets for each source. For example:

  • Source 1 (Topic / Tone / Main Points)
  • Source 2 (Topic / Tone / Main Points)
  • Source 3 (Topic/Tone/ Main Points)

Note: On the SAT® Reading and Writing test, this notes step is already completed for you. You are given a bulleted list of notes a student took when researching a specific topic.

Step 3: Identify Connections and Contrasts

Look for areas where sources support each other or present opposing ideas. This is crucial for the SAT® Reading and Writing Test because synthesis often requires acknowledging both agreement and tension.

Note: On the SAT® Reading and Writing test, you are given a specific writing goal for the student’s research. Then, you are asked: “Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

Step 4: Organize Ideas into a Cohesive Answer

Arrange the key points into themes or categories. This makes it easier to see how sources relate and which points to emphasize.

Step 5: Draft and Revise for Clarity and Effectiveness

Write a first draft that incorporates the best evidence from each text. Then, edit for clarity. Use transition words (for example, “in addition,” “however,” “therefore”) to guide readers through the argument.

Note: On the SAT® Reading and Writing Test, you will choose the multiple choice answer that best expresses a synthesis of student research to achieve the research goal.

Example of Rhetorical Synthesis

Imagine a prompt that asks students to write about the role of technology in modern classrooms. Two sources are provided:

  • Source A: A teacher’s blog post explaining how tablets increase student engagement.
  • Source B: A study showing that excessive screen time can cause distractions.

Step-by-Step Synthesis

1. Read and Annotate Sources

  • Source A: Focus on engagement and interactive lessons.
  • Source B: Emphasis on risks of too much screen time.

2. Take Bulleted Notes

  • Source A:
    • Students concentrate more with interactive apps
    • Increased participation in class polls
  • Source B:
    • Too many notifications lead to multitasking
    • Suggests structured limits on device use

3. Identify Connections and Contrasts

  • Both sources address the use of technology in the classroom.
  • Source A sees benefits in engagement.
  • Source B warns about potential drawbacks if not monitored.

4. Organize Ideas

  • Theme 1: The educational potential of technology
  • Theme 2: Negative effects of overuse

5. Draft and Revise

  • Draft a paragraph or two that presents both benefits and drawbacks.
  • Use transitions like “on the other hand” or “in contrast” to show differing viewpoints.
  • End with a balanced stance: technology helps learning but needs limits.

Final Synthesized Response (Summarized)

Technology can boost engagement by making learning interactive and enjoyable. However, without mindful limits, students may face distractions that hinder progress. Therefore, teachers could balance tablet use by setting guidelines that maintain focus while still taking advantage of digital tools.

Tips for Effective Rhetorical Synthesis

  • Keep the Audience and Research Goal in Mind
    • Think about who is reading and why they care.
    • For instance, parents might want evidence about safety, while students might want practical tips.
    • Your synthesis should address the goal of your research and writing.
  • Use Transitional Phrases for Clarity
    • Words such as “furthermore,” “in addition,” and “therefore” help readers follow the argument.
  • Consider Contrasts, Not Just Similarities
    • Some sources may counter each other’s viewpoints.
    • Present both sides to show a full understanding of the topic.

Practice Makes Perfect

Students can hone their skills by doing the following:

  1. Pick a Topic of Interest
    • Choose something broad, like climate change or social media usage.
  2. Gather Two or Three Sources
    • These can be articles, videos, or podcasts.
    • Look for sources with different perspectives.
  3. Practice the Steps
    • Read actively and annotate.
    • Make bulleted notes.
    • Combine the ideas in a short paragraph.
  4. Check for Transitions
    • Ensure sentences flow logically.
    • Compare or contrast arguments accurately.

Below is a quick practice prompt with a step-by-step solution:

Practice Prompt

“Should schools require uniforms, and how does this affect school spirit versus individual expression?”

  • Source A: A survey showing that uniforms create a sense of unity.
  • Source B: A student’s op-ed stating that uniforms reduce creativity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1. Read and Annotate Sources

  • Source A: Key points on unity, belonging, and reduced bullying.
  • Source B: Main argument on personal style and student morale.

2. Take Bulleted Notes

  • Source A:
    • Unifying factor, improved focus on academics
    • Some students feel more equal
  • Source B:
    • Stifles personal choice
    • May negatively affect self-expression

3. Identify Connections/Contrasts

  • Agreement: School choice about clothing affects student life
  • Disagreement: Uniforms help or harm student morale and creativity

4. Organize Ideas

  • Theme 1: Unity and equality
  • Theme 2: Impact on creativity

5. Draft and Revise

  • Students may feel united, but personal expression might be lost.
  • Use transitions: “on the other hand,” “in contrast.”

Possible Synthesized Paragraph

Requiring uniforms can help schools build unity because students focus more on shared goals than clothing differences. However, according to a student’s view, uniforms restrict creativity. Therefore, while school uniforms may boost academic focus, they can also limit individual expression.

Vocabulary Reference Chart

Below is a quick chart with key words and definitions to help with rhetorical synthesis. Copy and paste this table into a Google Doc for easy reference:

TermDefinition
Rhetorical SynthesisCombining multiple sources to form a cohesive, persuasive argument or explanation.
AudienceThe intended readers or viewers of a piece of writing or media.
PurposeThe goal an author aims to achieve (e.g., persuade, inform, entertain).
ToneThe author’s attitude or approach, such as serious, formal, or conversational.
PerspectiveThe angle or viewpoint from which an author presents information (e.g., personal bias).
ConnectionsSimilarities or points of agreement across different texts or sources.
ContrastsDifferences or points of tension between texts or sources.
AnnotateTo take notes on a text, highlighting important details and comments.
Cohesive AnswerA response where all points link together logically and clearly.
Transitional PhrasesWords or phrases that help guide readers by showing relationships between ideas.

Conclusion

Rhetorical synthesis is an essential skill for the SAT® Reading and Writing Test and for many school assignments. It helps students merge varied ideas, strengthen arguments, and present balanced viewpoints. Therefore, consistent practice with reading, annotating, and combining sources will improve writing quality and deepen critical thinking. With these guidelines and examples in mind, students can become confident in drafting synthesized responses that meet specific rhetorical goals in essays, research papers, and beyond.

Sharpen Your Skills for SAT® Reading and Writing

Are you preparing for the SAT® Reading and Writing test? We’ve got you covered! Try our review articles designed to help you confidently tackle real-world SAT® Reading and Writing problems. You’ll find everything you need to succeed, from quick tips to detailed strategies. Start exploring now!

Need help preparing for your SAT® Reading and Writing exam?

Albert has hundreds of SAT® Reading and Writing practice questions and full-length practice tests to try out.

Interested in a school license?​

Bring Albert to your school and empower all teachers with the world's best question bank for:

➜ SAT® & ACT®
➜ AP®
➜ ELA, Math, Science, & Social Studies
➜ State assessments

Options for teachers, schools, and districts.